Archive
#XenMobile on Android and MicroVPN issue unless you really synch Worx releases…
Hi,
If you’ve worked with XenMobile and especially the AppController to deploy WorxMail and WorxWeb you know that these establish a MicroVPN tunnel to reach internal resources when needed.
One thing that I noted today was that when you upgrade your AppController and NetScalers and people also upgrade their Worx Home app on Android you can run into an issue unless you upgrade and align your Worx Home and WorxWeb apps.
The new Worx Home 8.6.1 on Android requires that you run WorxWeb 1.3.3 from Citrix, otherwise the MicroVPN tunnel won’t be established and you won’t reach your internal resources through it.
So it’s more important than ever to ensure that you try your NetScaler, AppController and Worx apps and align their releases.. once they work then you see this great progress and tunnel being established.
It would be nice to get a good table of which versions of each product/component that you should run and which ones that can support all use cases like; XenMobile , ShareFile on prem, ICA/HDX proxy, SSL VPN and SmartAccess for RfW and proxy! I’ve not yet found one combination that delivers everything. 😉
Happy XenMobile’ing!
//Richard
Choose your #Citrix #NetScaler … wisely… – via @hlouwers
This is a question I get a lot and I must say that Henny Louwers did answer it well in this blog post!
I spend a lot of my time breaking down the different models of Citrix NetScaler appliances and different Software Editions within the Citrix NetScaler portfolio.
I decided to set up a blog about this since the path is usually pretty much (lengthy but) the same. This does not mean the answer is always easy because there are a lot of questions that need to be answered.
The first thing I would like to get off my chest is the following: Stop seeing/selling the Citrix NetScaler as a replacement for Secure Gateway. It is so much more than that. I often have discussions with various engineers and consultants telling me that Citrix NetScaler is so expensive for a Remote Access solution because Secure Gateway always used to be free. No offense but a Citrix NetScaler solution belongs to the networking department, not the Citrix XenApp sys admin department. Or maybe limited.
That leads me to the first difficult thing of a Citrix NetScaler project. The adoption of the Citrix NetScaler appliances to the networking guys of an organization. They need to embrace the solution to make this a success. For some reason they too see it as a ‘’Citrix’’ solution. For that reason one of the most important meetings to setup is usually with the networking guys to try to explain the L3-L7 functionality of the Citrix NetScaler solution. When they realize it competes with F5, Juniper, Cisco, etc then we are on the right track.
NetScaler Gateway or NetScaler Standard Edition
Usually the first question of a customer is regarding something simple like replacing the Remote Access solution. Since the NetScaler is going to be the main platform for publishing Citrix publications a NetScaler Gateway can be considered as a valid option. This is when I tell a customer it would be wise to spend a little extra on the NetScaler Standard Edition since this would leverage the solution be having full load balancing capabilities (among others). When you compare prices between the NetScaler Gateway and NetScaler Standard Edition you will see that the Standard Edition will be somewhat more expensive but I for one think that it is worth the difference given the feature set that come with the Standard Edition. Of course the NetScaler Gateway can always be upgraded to a NetScaler Standard Edition (or higher) if you will.
Another feature of Citrix NetScaler Standard Edition is the ability to run Citrix Web Interface on the appliance. Honestly, I do think is not really that important anymore….
Continue reading here!
//Richard
#Citrix #AppController 2.6 released as part of #MobileSolutions #Bundle #BYOD
As a part of the Mobile Solutions Bundle that now is available on MyCitrix you can find a new version of AppController.
AppController 2.6 supports the following new features:
- Certificate support. When you configure AppController for the first time in the web-based management console, you can add or create certificates on the Active Directory settings page.
- Microsoft Hyper-V support. You can install the AppController 2.6 virtual machine on Windows Server 2012 with Hyper-V enabled or on Microsoft Hyper-V Server 2012.
- Migration support to AppController 2.6. You can upgrade to AppController 2.6 from AppController 2.0 or from AppController 2.5.
- Mobile store support. You can upload mobile apps from the Apple App Store or Google Play to AppController. You can use the Citrix App Preparation Tool to wrap iOS and Android apps from the Apple App Store or Google Play. When you wrap the app, you can secure access and enforce policies. When you upload the app to AppController, you can configure the policies. You can also upload an app from the App Store or Google Play to AppController without using the App Preparation Tool.
- Secure connections to Active Directory. You can configure secure connections to Active Directory when you configure AppController 2.6 for the first time.
- ShareFile updates. In previous AppController versions, when you configured ShareFile, the domain sharefile.com was automatically appended to the domain name. In this release, the domain sharefile.com does not automatically append to the ShareFile domain name. You must enter the entire ShareFile domain name.
- Support for mobile links. You can configure mobile links to retrieve the name and description of apps automatically from the Apple App Store. For apps available through the Google Play Store, you enter the name, description and URL of the app. When you configure mobile links, links appear in Receiver with the Play Store or App Store name.
- Web proxy user name format. When you configure the web proxy, you can use either the SAMAccount format or the User Principal Name (UPN) as the user name.
Read more about it here!
//Richard
NetScaler MPX vs. SDX dilemma
Hi again!
Ok, I may be totally off and wrong here but I see a bit of a problem with the Citrix product packaging and offering around the whole NetScaler product.
I love the fact that the product is available as virtual appliances (VPX) and physical appliances (MPX) and the lovely “mix-product” which is the SDX platform. The SDX is a lovely addition and I see so many reasons for why you want to go towards that platform, so bear with me.
The NetScaler product itself is a great product and the feature set it rich! It’s definitely rich in terms of what features it offers from the same appliance! Some of the marketing of the product against competitors is that you can do it all (GSLB, LB, SSL offloading, SSL VPN, Application Firewall, ICA/HDX proxy etc.) on one appliance instead of purchasing several. Have a look at the editions of the product and the rich feature offering;
But I must challenge this whole idea of putting all features/capabilities on one appliance! What if you decide to build a service on the NetScaler product and decide to provide these capabilities;
- Access Gateway
- Network Connect (SSL VPN access)
- Network Proxy (ICA/HDX proxying)
- End-to-end Web Security (AAA etc.)
- Load Balancing (LB, GSLB)
So imagine that if for some reason you need a new version of the NetScaler appliance or if Citrix provides a fix for a bug/issue that is related to one of the capabilities. Then you have to stop your whole service delivery of all of them just to apply a patch/update targeted for one of them. Is that good from an incident, problem, change management point of view? I guess that’s why I like the SDX platform where I then can put the capabilities on different VPX instances on the same SDX HW platform.
This then also leads you to the whole cost of the service if you also like this idea of separation of duties, how much does the SDX cost and what does the VPX instances cost (they are purchased in bundles of 5 where 5 is included with the SDX purchase). And except for the cost of the HW, SW and SA you have the complexity that you have to select which of the SDX platforms to choose (see a more detailed NetScaler Datasheet here). And this is the biggest issue as I see it! I’d like to recommend the SDX platform to more customers than the enterprise segment. But then you have an issue, the SDX platforms starts on the 11 500 appliance.
Why doesn’t Citrix offer the SDX model on the smaller appliances?? I’d like to understand that because I think that most customers out there will not require that much throughput or CCU etc that the 11 500 delivers….
And there are more reasons to why you would like an SDX model other than separation of duties.. but more on that in another post.
Cheers!
//Richard